Did you start all your nodes at the correct tokens or did you balance
by moving them? Moving nodes around won't delete unneeded data after
the move is done.

Try running 'nodetool cleanup' on all of your nodes.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Raj N <raj.cassan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually I am not worried about the percentage. Its the data I am concerned
> about. Look at the first node. It has 102.07GB data. And the other nodes
> have around 60 GB(one has 69, but lets ignore that one). I am not
> understanding why the first node has almost double the data.
>
> Thanks
> -Raj
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Nick Bailey <n...@datastax.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is just a known problem with the nodetool output and multiple
>> DCs. Your configuration is correct. The problem with nodetool is fixed
>> in 1.1.1
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3412
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Raj N <raj.cassan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi experts,
>> >     I have a 6 node cluster across 2 DCs(DC1:3, DC2:3). I have assigned
>> > tokens using the first strategy(adding 1) mentioned here -
>> >
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations?#Token_selection
>> >
>> > But when I run nodetool ring on my cluster, this is the result I get -
>> >
>> > Address         DC  Rack  Status State   Load        Owns    Token
>> >
>> >  113427455640312814857969558651062452225
>> > 172.17.72.91    DC1 RAC13 Up     Normal  102.07 GB   33.33%  0
>> > 45.10.80.144    DC2 RAC5  Up     Normal  59.1 GB     0.00%   1
>> > 172.17.72.93    DC1 RAC18 Up     Normal  59.57 GB    33.33%
>> >  56713727820156407428984779325531226112
>> > 45.10.80.146    DC2 RAC7  Up     Normal  59.64 GB    0.00%
>> > 56713727820156407428984779325531226113
>> > 172.17.72.95    DC1 RAC19 Up     Normal  69.58 GB    33.33%
>> >  113427455640312814857969558651062452224
>> > 45.10.80.148    DC2 RAC9  Up     Normal  59.31 GB    0.00%
>> > 113427455640312814857969558651062452225
>> >
>> >
>> > As you can see the first node has considerably more load than the
>> > others(almost double) which is surprising since all these are replicas
>> > of
>> > each other. I am running Cassandra 0.8.4. Is there an explanation for
>> > this
>> > behaviour? Could https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2433 be
>> > the
>> > cause for this?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Raj
>
>

Reply via email to