Is ur client code calling with asyncrhynous requests?? and whats ur replication factor and read consistency level.
In any case, 2 nodes might take as much time as one, but should not be slow (unless u also doubled the data)... On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Prakrati Agrawal <prakrati.agra...@mu-sigma.com> wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > Initially I had a one node cluster and I flooded my data into it. I then ran > my Hector code to get some rows and columns. It took around 52.793 seconds. > > Then I added one more node to the cluster. I again ran the same code and it > took around 112.065 seconds. > > Cassandra should perform faster when there are more nodes was my belief.Is > my belief wrong or am I doing something wrong? Please help me > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Prakrati > > > > > ________________________________ > This email message may contain proprietary, private and confidential > information. The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s) > or entities to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, > this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited and may be illegal. If you received this in error, please contact > the sender and delete the message from your system. > > Mu Sigma takes all reasonable steps to ensure that its electronic > communications are free from viruses. However, given Internet accessibility, > the Company cannot accept liability for any virus introduced by this e-mail > or any attachment and you are advised to use up-to-date virus checking > software.
