for what it's worth i've been having pretty good success using the Datastax AMIs.

On 5/17/2012 6:59 PM, koji Lin wrote:

Hi

We use amazon ami 3.2.12-3.2.4.amzn1.x86_64

and some of our data file are more than 10G

thanks

koji

2012-5-16 下午6:00 於 "aaron morton" <aa...@thelastpickle.com <mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com>> 寫道:

    On Ubuntu ? Sounds like
    http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#ubuntu_hangs

    Cheers


    -----------------
    Aaron Morton
    Freelance Developer
    @aaronmorton
    http://www.thelastpickle.com

    On 16/05/2012, at 2:13 PM, koji Lin wrote:

    Hi

    Our service already run cassandra 1.0 on 1x ec2 instances(with
ebs), and we saw lots of discussion talk about using ephemeral raid for better performance and consistent performance.

    So we want to create new instance using 4 ephemeral raid0, and
    copy the data from ebs to finally replace the old instance and
    reduce some .

    we create the xlarge instance with -b '/dev/sdb=ephemeral0' -b
    '/dev/sdc=ephemeral1' -b '/dev/sdd=ephemeral2' -b
    '/dev/sde=ephemeral3',

    and use mdadm command like this  mdadm --create /dev/md0
    --level=0 -c256 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde

    after copying file and start the cassandra(same token as old
    instance it replaced).

    we saw the read is really fast always keep 2xxm/sec, but system
    load exceed 40, with high iowait, and lots of client get timeout
    result. We guess maybe it's the problem of ec2 instance, so we
    create another one with same setting to replace other machine
    ,but the result is same . Then we rollback to ebs with single
    disk ,read speed keeps at 1xmb/sec but system becomes well
    .(using ebs with 2 disks raid0 will keep at 2xmb/sec and higher
    iowait then single disk ,but still works)

    Is there anyone meet the same problem too ? or do we forget
    something to configure?

    thank you

    koji



Reply via email to