YEAH! agree, it only matter for time bucket data. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:31 PM, R. Verlangen <ro...@us2.nl> wrote:
> That's true, but it does not sound like a real problem to me.. Maybe > someone else can shed some light upon this. > > > 2012/3/27 samal <samalgo...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:47 AM, R. Verlangen <ro...@us2.nl> wrote: >> >>> " but any schema change will break it " >>> >>> How do you mean? You don't have to specify the columns in Cassandra so >>> it should work perfect. Except for the "skill~" is preserverd for your list. >>> >> >> In case skill~ is decided to change to skill:: , it need to be handle at >> app level. Or otherwise had t update in all row, read it first, modify it, >> insert new version and delete old version. >> >> > > > -- > With kind regards, > > Robin Verlangen > www.robinverlangen.nl > >
