And sum of all rq/s threads is 160?? 2012/3/5 Jeesoo Shin <bsh...@gmail.com>
> Thank you for reply. :) > Yes I did multiple thread. > 160, 320 gave me same result. > > On 3/5/12, ruslan usifov <ruslan.usi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2012/3/5 Jeesoo Shin <bsh...@gmail.com> > > > >> Hi all. > >> > >> I have very SLOW READ here. :-( > >> I made a cluster with three node (aws xlarge, replication = 3) > >> Cassandra version is 1.0.6 > >> I have inserted 1,000,000 rows. (standard column) > >> Each row has 200 columns. > >> Each column has 16 byte key, 512 byte value. > >> > >> I used Hector createSliceQuery to get one column in a row. > >> This basic query(random row, fixed column) is created with multiple > >> thread and hit cassandra. > >> > >> I only get up to 140 request per second. Is this all I can get for read? > >> Or am I doing something wrong? > >> Interestingly, when I request rows which doesn't exist, it goes up to > >> 1600 per second. > >> > >> > > You must test read performance by paralel test (ie multiple threads). The > > result when not existent rows are more faster is result of bloom filter > > > > > > > >> > >> ANY insight, share will be extremely helpful. > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Jeesoo. > >> > > >
