Thanks for the info.

Upgrade within the 1.0.x branch is simply a rolling restart, right?

Bill

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> CASSANDRA-3496, fixed in 1.0.4+
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Bill Au <bill.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am running 1.0.2 with the default tiered compaction.  After running a
> > "nodetool compact", I noticed that on about half of the machines in my
> > cluster, both "nodetool ring" and "nodetool info" report that the load is
> > actually higher than before when I expect it to be lower.  It is almost
> > twice as much as before.  I did a du command on the data directory and
> found
> > the the actual disk usage is only about half of what's being reported by
> > nodetool.  Since I am running 1.0.2, there are no compacted sstables
> waiting
> > to be removed.  I manually trigger a full GC in the JVM but that made no
> > difference.  When I restarted Cassandra, nodetool once again report the
> > correct load.
> >
> > Is this a known problem?
> >
> > Bill
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support
> http://www.datastax.com
>

Reply via email to