Perfect, Aaron, Thanks a lot


From: aaron morton [mailto:aa...@thelastpickle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 12:54 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary indexes and cardinality

Heard that indexing a field with high cardinality is not good.
http://www.datastax.com/docs/0.7/data_model/secondary_indexes

Will there be any performance improvement? Is this the way secondary indexes 
are maintained?
Updating secondary indexes requires a read and a write.

Also this makes me think - Will there be any lose if we have many rows in a CF 
say 10 million?
http://www.datastax.com/docs/0.7/data_model/cfs_as_indexes#indexes

Having 10 million columns in a row is not a problem by itself. It depends on 
how you want to read things.

Cheers

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 14/02/2012, at 1:11 AM, Tiwari, Dushyant wrote:


Hi Cassandra Users,

Heard that indexing a field with high cardinality is not good. If we create a 
CF to store the index information like indexed field as key and the keys of 
original CF as cols in the row. Will there be any performance improvement? Is 
this the way secondary indexes are maintained?

Also this makes me think - Will there be any lose if we have many rows in a CF 
say 10 million?

Thanks,
Dushyant


________________________________
NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or 
views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice 
within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in error, 
please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender 
immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or 
privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under 
applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject 
to terms available at the following link: 
http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, 
please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By 
messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or 
views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice 
within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in error, 
please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender 
immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or 
privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under 
applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject 
to terms available at the following link: 
http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, 
please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By 
messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.

Reply via email to