On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Jean-Nicolas Boulay Desjardins < jnbdzjn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Milind Parikh, Rainbird is back by Twitter... My worry is that you > might not be around in the future... Also, do you have evidence that > your system is better? Because Rainbird is used by Twitter. > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Milind Parikh <milindpar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I used rainbird as inspiration for Countandra (& some of publicly > available data structures from rainbird preso). That said, there are > significant differences between the two architectures. Additiomally as > Cassandra begins to provide triggets, some very interesting things will > become possible in Countandra. > > Hth > > Regards > > Milind > > > > /*********************** > > sent from my android...please pardon occasional typos as I respond @ the > speed of thought > > ************************/ > > > > On Jan 21, 2012 3:37 PM, "Jean-Nicolas Boulay Desjardins" < > jnbdzjn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But What about: Rainbird? > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:52 AM, R. Verlangen <ro...@us2.nl> wrote: > > > > > > A couple of days ago I cam... > Rainbird has never been open sourced. So even if rainbird was better or worse it would not matter because no one outside of twitter can use it. Other options: (aka do it yourself with) http://docs.s4.io/manual/joining_streams.html http://peregrine_mapreduce.bitbucket.org/ http://www.slideshare.net/nathanmarz/storm-distributed-and-faulttolerant-realtime-computation I have not tried countsandra but if you want proof of it's fitness you should download it and try it out.
