It does not appear to affect the response time, certainly not in a positive
way.

2012/1/5 Philippe <[email protected]>

> What if you shutdown the cassandra service on the slow node, does that
> improve your read performance ?
> If it does then that sole node is responsible for the slow down because it
> can't act as a coordinator fast enough.
>
> 2012/1/5 R. Verlangen <[email protected]>
>
> I'm also reading with CL = ONE
>>
>>
>> 2012/1/5 Philippe <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Depending on the CL you're reading at it will yes : if the CL requires
>>> that the "slow" node create a digest of the data and send it to the
>>> coordinator then it might explain the poor performance on reads. What is
>>> your read CL ?
>>>
>>> 2012/1/5 R. Verlangen <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> As I posted this I noticed that the other node's CPU is running high on
>>>> some other cronjobs (every couple of minutes to 60% usage). Is the lack of
>>>> more CPU cycles a problem in this case?
>>>>
>>>> Robin
>>>>
>>>> 2012/1/5 R. Verlangen <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> CPU is idle (< 10% usage). Disk reads occasionally blocks over 32/64K.
>>>>> Writes around 0-5MB per second. Network traffic 0.1 / 0.1 MB/s (in / out).
>>>>> Paging 0. System int ~ 1300, csw ~ 2500.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/1/5 Philippe <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> What can you see in vmstat/dstat ?
>>>>>> Le 5 janv. 2012 11:58, "R. Verlangen" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm running a cassandra 0.8.6 cluster with 2 nodes (in 2 DC's), RF =
>>>>>>> 2. Actual data on the nodes is only 1GB. Disk latency < 1ms. Disk
>>>>>>> throughput ~ 0.4MB/s. OS load always below 1 (on a 8 core machine with 
>>>>>>> 16GB
>>>>>>> ram).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I'm running my writes against the cluster with cl = ONE all
>>>>>>> reads appear to be faster then the writes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Average write speed = 1600us/operation
>>>>>>> Average read speed = 200us/operation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm really wondering why this is the case. Anyone got a clue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With kind regards,
>>>>>>> Robin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to