What was the replication factor for the keyspace ? 

If it was 1 that sounds like reasonable behavior. Try increasing the RF to 2. 

Cheers

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 12/09/2011, at 8:24 PM, RAJASHEKAR REDDY wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I Installed Cassandra 0.8.4 on two systems configure like below
>  
> System 1: IP "10.1.1.1" which is acting as seed
>     
>   - seeds: "10.1.1.1"
>   listen_address: 10.1.1.1
>   rpc_address: 10.1.1.1
>  
>   
> System 2: IP "10.1.1.2" which is acting as node
>  
>  - seeds: "10.1.1.1"
>  listen_address: 10.1.1.2
>  rpc_address: 10.1.1.2
>  
> Followed the steps below
>  
> 1. Now i started System 1 (Seed) and created Key Space called "aspace".
> 2. Now Started the System 2 (Node) and use the Key Space "aspace" 
> successfully.
> 3. Now in System 1 (Seed) created column family and maintain a record.
> 4. Now in System 2 (Node) tested getting the created record in seed is 
> success.
> 5. Now in System 1 (Seed) tested getting the create record in itself and it 
> is success.
> 6. Now i shutdown the Cassandra in system 2 (Node).
> 7. After shutdown of System 2 (Node) i am trying to get the record in System 
> 1 (Seed) where the record was created, but failed to get the record as it 
> return null.
> 8. Again i brought the System 2 (Node) up, then tested in System 1 (seed) to 
> get the record, it is success.
>  
>  
> My understand with Cassandra is irrespective of system down or up the record 
> should be available on other systems(node\seed);
>  
> So when we stop the Node the records created on Seed were not available for 
> Seed it self, also vice versa? 
>  
> Did I miss any configuration?
>  
> Advance thanks for your help.
>  
>  
> Observation:
>  The crazy is that i noted the record is not displayed on created system when 
> the other system (node) is down but same record is accessible when the record 
> created system(seed) is down also tested vice versa situation is same.
>  
>  
> Regards
> P. Rajashekar Reddy 
> 

Reply via email to