To the best of my ability to predict the future, we would probably enhance "native" composite columns with those features, but not expose them in the old supercolumn API.
So again, if supercolumns work for you, we won't pull the rug out from under you, but don't start using them expecting them to become something more advanced. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Boris Yen <yulin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > AFAIK, you might change the internal implementation of super column family > by using the composite column. Does this mean that maybe the secondary index > will be supported on super columns in the future? will you use composite > column to add more capability to super column family or we are still advised > not to use super column family when possible? > Regards > Boris > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sure, but it's still only useful for equality predicates. >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Boris Yen <yulin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I was wondering if anyone would know if secondary index can be enabled >> > on >> > composite columns? >> > Regards >> > Boris >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Ellis >> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra >> co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support >> http://www.datastax.com > > -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com
