Why do you need another CF? Is there something wrong with repeating the key as a column and indexing it?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exactly. In any case, I just answered my own question. If I need > range, I can just make another column family where the column name are > these keys > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Nate McCall <n...@datastax.com> wrote: > >> yes,but why would you use CompositeType if you don't need range query? > > > > If you were doing composite keys anyway (common approach with time > > series data for example), you would not have to write parsing and > > concatenation code. Particularly useful if you had mixed types in the > > key. > > >