Anyone know if secondary index performance should be in the 100-500 ms range.  
That's what we're seeing right now when doing lookups on a single value.  We've 
increased keys_cached and rows_cached to 100% for that column family and assume 
that the secondary index gets the same attributes.  I've also reduced 
read_repair_chance to 0.2 because it doesn't get overwritten very frequently.

Is the assumption that rows/keys cached is inherited correct?  Is there any way 
to see cfstats on secondary index sub-column families?

Thanks,

Jeremy

Reply via email to