Missed that in the history, cheers. A ----------------- Aaron Morton Freelance Cassandra Developer @aaronmorton http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 23 Jun 2011, at 20:26, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > As Jonathan said earlier, you are hitting > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2765 > > This will be fixed in 0.8.1 that is currently under a vote and should be > released soon (let's say beginning of next week, maybe sooner). > > -- > Sylvain > > 2011/6/23 Héctor Izquierdo Seliva <izquie...@strands.com>: >> Hi Aaron. Reverted back to 4-32. Did the flush but it did not trigger >> any minor compaction. Ran compact by hand, and it picked only two >> sstables. >> >> Here's the ls before: >> >> http://pastebin.com/xDtvVZvA >> >> And this is the ls after: >> >> http://pastebin.com/DcpbGvK6 >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> >> >> El jue, 23-06-2011 a las 10:55 +1200, aaron morton escribió: >>> Setting them to 2 and 2 means compaction can only ever compact 2 files at >>> time, so it will be worse off. >>> >>> Lets the try following: >>> >>> - restore the compactions settings to the default 4 and 32 >>> - run `ls -lah` in the data dir and grab the output >>> - run `nodetool flush` this will trigger minor compaction once the >>> memtables have been flushed >>> - check the logs for messages from 'CompactionManager' >>> - when done grab the output from `ls -lah` again. >>> >>> Hope that helps. >>> >>> >>> ----------------- >>> Aaron Morton >>> Freelance Cassandra Developer >>> @aaronmorton >>> http://www.thelastpickle.com >>> >>> On 23 Jun 2011, at 02:04, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All. I set the compaction threshold at minimum 2, maximum 2 and try >>>> to run compact, but it's not doing anything. There are over 69 sstables >>>> now, read performance is horrible, and it's taking an insane amount of >>>> space. Maybe I don't quite get how the new per bucket stuff works, but I >>>> think this is not normal behaviour. >>>> >>>> El lun, 13-06-2011 a las 10:32 -0500, Jonathan Ellis escribió: >>>>> As Terje already said in this thread, the threshold is per bucket >>>>> (group of similarly sized sstables) not per CF. >>>>> >>>>> 2011/6/13 Héctor Izquierdo Seliva <izquie...@strands.com>: >>>>>> I was already way over the minimum. There were 12 sstables. Also, is >>>>>> there any reason why scrub got stuck? I did not see anything in the >>>>>> logs. Via jmx I saw that the scrubbed bytes were equal to one of the >>>>>> sstables size, and it stuck there for a couple hours . >>>>>> >>>>>> El lun, 13-06-2011 a las 22:55 +0900, Terje Marthinussen escribió: >>>>>>> That most likely happened just because after scrub you had new files >>>>>>> and got over the "4" file minimum limit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2697 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is the bug report. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >>
