yes. each one corresponds with taking a node down for various reasons. i think more people should show their graphs. it's great. hoping Oberman has some.....so we can see what his look like ,,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Chris Burroughs <chris.burrou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do all of the reductions in Used on that graph correspond to node restarts? > > My Zabbix for reference: http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/383/2weekmem.png > > > On 06/22/2011 06:35 PM, Sasha Dolgy wrote: >> http://www.twitpic.com/5fdabn >> http://www.twitpic.com/5fdbdg >> >> i do love a good graph. two of the weekly memory utilization graphs >> for 2 of the 4 servers from this ring... week 21 was a nice week ... >> the week before 0.8.0 went out proper. since then, bumped up to 0.8 >> and have seen a steady increase in the memory consumption (used) but >> have not seen the swap do what it did ...and the buffered/cached seems >> much better >> >> -sd >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Chris Burroughs >> <chris.burrou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In `free` terms, by pegged do you mean that free "Mem" was 0, or "-/+ >>> buffers/cache" as 0? > > -- Sasha Dolgy sasha.do...@gmail.com
