Ah.. I just found Cassandra-2698 (I thought I had seen something about this)...
I guess that means I have too see if I can find time to investigate if I have a reproducible case? Terje On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Terje Marthinussen <tmarthinus...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > I have been testing repairs a bit in different ways on 0.8.0 and I am > curious on what to really expect in terms of data transferred. > > I would expect my data to be fairly consistent in this case from the start. > More than a billion supercolumns, but there was no errors in feed and we > have seen minimal amounts of read repair going on while doing a complete > scan of the data for consistency checking. As such, I would also expect > repair to finish reasonably fast. > > On some nodes, it finishes in a couple of hours, but other nodes it is > taking more than 12 hours and I see some 65GB of data streamed to the node > which surprises me as I am pretty sure that it is not that out of sync. > > Not sure how much the merkle trees are actually reducing what needs to be > streamed though. > > What should we expect to see if this works? > > Regards, > Terje >
