It looks like it's an issue with Ubuntu 9.10 (or my install of 9.10). Tried on a machine running 10.04 and it works fine...
On 30 April 2011 12:35, Dan Washusen <d...@reactive.org> wrote: > Thanks for the response. :) > > I should have also mentioned that I'm running this on Ubuntu Karmic > Koala<http://i44.tinypic.com/27xp2lc.jpg>(9.10). > > The output of `sudo aptitude full-upgrade` looks the same as safe-upgrade: > >> Reading package lists... Done >> Building dependency tree >> Reading state information... Done >> Reading extended state information >> Initializing package states... Done >> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. >> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. >> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. >> Reading package lists... Done >> Building dependency tree >> Reading state information... Done >> Reading extended state information >> Initializing package states... Done > > > Here is the output of 'apt-cache policy && apt-cache policy cassandra': > http://pastebin.com/PqRiGmWi > > > On 30 April 2011 11:18, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:34 +1000, Dan Washusen wrote: >> > > sudo aptitude update >> > >> > sudo aptitude safe-upgrade >> > >> > >> > The upgrade shows this: >> > >> > > Reading package lists... Done >> > > Building dependency tree >> > > Reading state information... Done >> > > Reading extended state information >> > > Initializing package states... Done >> > > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. >> > > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and *1 not >> > upgraded*. >> > > Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. >> > > Reading package lists... Done >> > > Building dependency tree >> > > Reading state information... Done >> > > Reading extended state information >> > > Initializing package states... Done >> > >> > >> > The above mentions that 1 package wasn't upgraded (I assume this is >> > 0.7.5). >> > Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing wrong? >> >> Usually this means that upgrading would install a new package (i.e. that >> it picked up a new dependency), which shouldn't be the case. You might >> try an `aptitude full-upgrade' just to see what that might be. You >> could also try pasting the output of `apt-cache policy && apt-cache >> policy cassandra' to the list. >> >> -- >> Eric Evans >> eev...@rackspace.com >> >> >
