Sure is: scale7-pelops-1.1-0.7.x-20110418.225848-3.jar
Cheers, -- Dan Washusen On Tuesday, 19 April 2011 at 3:58 PM, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva wrote: > Thanks Dan for fixing that! Is the change integrated in the latest maven > snapshot? > > El mar, 19-04-2011 a las 10:48 +1000, Dan Washusen escribió: > > An example scenario (that is now fixed in Pelops): > > 1. Attempt to write a column with a null value > > 2. Cassandra throws a TProtocolException which renders the > > connection useless for future operations > > 3. Pelops returns the corrupt connection to the pool > > 4. A second read operation is attempted with the corrupt > > connection and Cassandra throws an ApplicationException > > A Pelops test case for this can be found here: > > https://github.com/s7/scale7-pelops/blob/3fe7584a24bb4b62b01897a814ef62415bd2fe43/src/test/java/org/scale7/cassandra/pelops/MutatorIntegrationTest.java#L262 > > > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Dan Washusen > > > > > > On Tuesday, 19 April 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > > > Any idea what's causing the original TPE? > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Dan Washusen <d...@reactive.org> > > > wrote: > > > > It turns out that once a TProtocolException is thrown from > > > > Cassandra the > > > > connection is useless for future operations. Pelops was closing > > > > connections > > > > when it detected TimedOutException, TTransportException and > > > > UnavailableException but not TProtocolException. We have now > > > > changed Pelops > > > > to close connections is all cases *except* NotFoundException. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > > > Dan Washusen > > > > > > > > On Friday, 8 April 2011 at 7:28 AM, Dan Washusen wrote: > > > > > > > > Pelops uses a single connection per operation from a pool that is > > > > backed by > > > > Apache Commons Pool (assuming you're using Cassandra 0.7). I'm > > > > not saying > > > > it's perfect but it's NOT sharing a connection over multiple > > > > threads. > > > > Dan Hendry mentioned that he sees these errors. Is he also using > > > > Pelops? > > > > From his comment about retrying I'd assume not... > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Dan Washusen > > > > > > > > On Thursday, 7 April 2011 at 7:39 PM, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 21:04 -0500, Jonathan Ellis escribió: > > > > > > > > "out of sequence response" is thrift's way of saying "I got a > > > > response > > > > for request Y when I expected request X." > > > > > > > > my money is on using a single connection from multiple threads. > > > > don't do > > > > that. > > > > > > > > I'm not using thrift directly, and my application is single > > > > thread, so I > > > > guess this is Pelops fault somehow. Since I managed to tame memory > > > > comsuption the problem has not appeared again, but it always > > > > happened > > > > during a stop-the-world GC. Could it be that the message was sent > > > > instead of being dropped by the server when the client assumed it > > > > had > > > > timed out? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jonathan Ellis > > > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > > > co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra > > > support > > > http://www.datastax.com >
