With my six node cluster ... nodetool loadbalance should be run on one node or all six? I run it on one and the ownership percentage gets even more unbalanced. So... in the spirit of the evening, I run it on another node ..... as you see, the ownership % keeps increasing and the token numbers keep increasing. is this expected? I would have hoped that the behaviour would be a little bit different. Maybe I've missed something big....
Address Status State Load Owns Token 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 225 KB 40.78% 24053088190195663439419935163232881936 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 201.21 KB 19.17% 56667357399723182105247119364967854254 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 213.15 KB 17.61% 86624712919272143003828971968762407027 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 214.54 KB 11.22% 105714724128406151241468359303513100912 10.0.0.5 Up Normal 206.39 KB 5.61% 115259729732973155360288052970888447854 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 242.93 KB 5.61% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 Address Status State Load Owns Token 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 206.15 KB 59.95% 56667357399723182105247119364967854254 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 218.1 KB 17.61% 86624712919272143003828971968762407027 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 219.48 KB 11.22% 105714724128406151241468359303513100912 10.0.0.5 Up Normal 216.31 KB 5.61% 115259729732973155360288052970888447854 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 224.32 KB 2.81% 120032232535256657419697899804576121325 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 242.93 KB 2.81% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 Address Status State Load Owns Token 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 218.1 KB 77.56% 86624712919272143003828971968762407027 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 225.71 KB 11.22% 105714724128406151241468359303513100912 10.0.0.5 Up Normal 216.31 KB 5.61% 115259729732973155360288052970888447854 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 224.32 KB 2.81% 120032232535256657419697899804576121325 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 201.21 KB 1.40% 122418483936398408449402823221419958061 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 242.93 KB 1.40% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 Address Status State Load Owns Token 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 225.71 KB 88.78% 105714724128406151241468359303513100912 10.0.0.5 Up Normal 225.61 KB 5.61% 115259729732973155360288052970888447854 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 224.32 KB 2.81% 120032232535256657419697899804576121325 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 201.21 KB 1.40% 122418483936398408449402823221419958061 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 218.13 KB 0.70% 123611609636969283964255284929841876429 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 242.93 KB 0.70% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 Address Status State Load Owns Token 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.5 Up Leaving 225.61 KB 94.39% 115259729732973155360288052970888447854 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 214.39 KB 2.81% 120032232535256657419697899804576121325 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 201.21 KB 1.40% 122418483936398408449402823221419958061 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 218.13 KB 0.70% 123611609636969283964255284929841876429 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 220.77 KB 0.35% 124208172487254721721681515784052835613 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 248.08 KB 0.35% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 10.0.0.1 Up Normal 214.39 KB 97.19% 120032232535256657419697899804576121325 10.0.0.2 Up Normal 205.47 KB 1.40% 122418483936398408449402823221419958061 10.0.0.3 Up Normal 218.13 KB 0.70% 123611609636969283964255284929841876429 10.0.0.4 Up Normal 220.77 KB 0.35% 124208172487254721721681515784052835613 10.0.0.5 Up Normal 220.63 KB 0.18% 124506453912397440600394631211158315205 10.0.0.6 Up Normal 248.08 KB 0.18% 124804735337540159479107746638263794797 97.19% ... awesome. On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Narendra Sharma <narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the same page there is a section on Load Balance that talks about python > script to compute tokens. I believe your question is more about assigning > new tokens and not compute tokens. > > 1. "nodetool loadbalance" will result in recomputation of tokens. It will > pick tokens based on the load and not the once assigned by you. > 2. You can either use decommission and bootstrap with new tokens OR Use > "nodetool move" > > Thanks, > Naren
