Yes, I've read the discussion. My use-case is similar to the use-case of the contributor.
So that's the reason why I've asked if it works or not. (with the flaw of course). On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you read the discussion on that ticket, the point is that the > approach is fundamentally flawed. > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Utku Can Topçu <u...@topcu.gen.tr> > wrote: > > Can anyone confirm that this patch works with the current trunk? > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2103 > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Utku Can Topçu <u...@topcu.gen.tr> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I'm experimenting and developing using counters. However, I've come to > a > >>> usecase where I need counters to expire and get deleted after a certain > time > >>> of inactivity (i.e. have countercolumn deleted one hour after the last > >>> increment). > >>> > >>> As far as I can tell counter columns don't have TTL in the thrift > >>> interface, is it because of a limitation of the counter implementation? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Utku > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Ellis > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support > http://riptano.com >
