0.7.1 is what I would go with right now. It's likely you'll eventually have to upgrade that as well, but moving to other 0.7.x releases should be fairly painless. Most development is happening on the 0.7 releases, which already have lots of fixes over the 0.6 series (not to mention performance improvements and better logging in general).
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM, buddhasystem <potek...@bnl.gov> wrote: > > Hello, > > we are acquiring new hardware for our cluster and will be installing it > soon. It's likely that I won't need to rely on secondary index > functionality, as data will be write-once read-many and I can get away with > inverse index creation at load time, plus I have some more complex indexing > in mind than comes packaged (too much to explain here). > > So, if I don't need indexes, what is the most stable, reliable version of > Cassandra that I can put in production? I'm seeing bug reports here and > some > sound quite serious, I just want something that works day in, day out. > > Thank you, > > Maxim > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6028966.html > Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. >
