Did you force a major compaction (with jconsole or nodetool) after gc_grace
has elapsed ?

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Kallin Nagelberg <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Thanks, gc_grace works in the CLI.
>
> However, I'm not observing the desired effect. I am setting TTL on a
> single column in my column family, and I see the columns disappear
> when using 'list Session' (my columnfamily) in the CLI. I created the
> column family with gc_grace = 60, and after observing for a few
> minutes I am still seeing all the rows come back, none of them with
> columns. I was hoping the GC would delete the empty rows.
>
> -Kal
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>
> wrote:
> > Not very logically, It's actually gc_grace, not gc_grace_seconds in the
> CLI.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kallin Nagelberg
> > <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to set the gc_grace_seconds column family parameter but no
> >> luck.. I got the name of it from the comment in cassandra.yaml:
> >>
> >> #     - gc_grace_seconds: specifies the time to wait before garbage
> >> #        collecting tombstones (deletion markers). defaults to 864000
> (10
> >> #        days). See http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/DistributedDeletes
> >>
> >> create column family Session
> >>    with comparator = UTF8Type
> >>    and keys_cached = 10000
> >>    and memtable_flush_after = 1440
> >>    and memtable_throughput = 32
> >>        and gc_grace_seconds = 60;
> >>
> >> error is 'No enum const class
> >>
> >>
> org.apache.cassandra.cli.CliUserHelp$ColumnFamilyArgument.GC_GRACE_SECONDS'.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Kal
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >> I hope you don't consider this a hijack of the thread...
> >> >>
> >> >> What I'd like to know is the following:
> >> >>
> >> >> The GC removes TTL rows some time after they expire, at its
> >> >> convenience.
> >> >> But will they stop being returned as soon as they expire? (This is
> the
> >> >> expected behavior...)
> >> >
> >> > It is the individual column that have TTL. When a column expires, it
> >> > becomes
> >> > a delete tombstone. Now, a row with tombstones (even only them) will
> >> > show
> >> > during range request. But the explanation is
> >> > here: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#range_ghosts
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Kallin Nagelberg
> >> >> <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> So the empty row will be ultimately removed then? Is there a way to
> >> >>> for the GC to verify this?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> -Kal
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Stu Hood <stuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > The expired columns were converted into tombstones, which will
> live
> >> >>> > for
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > GC timeout. The "empty" row will be cleaned up when those
> tombstones
> >> >>> > are
> >> >>> > removed.
> >> >>> > Returning the empty row is unfortunate... we'd love to find a more
> >> >>> > appropriate solution that might not involve endless scanning.
> >> >>> > See
> >> >>> > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#i_deleted_what_gives
> >> >>> > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#range_ghosts
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Kallin Nagelberg
> >> >>> > <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> I also tried forcing a major compaction on the column family
> using
> >> >>> >> JMX
> >> >>> >> but the row remains.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Kallin Nagelberg
> >> >>> >> <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > I tried that but I still see the row coming back on a list
> >> >>> >> > <columnfamily> in the CLI. My concern is that there will be a
> >> >>> >> > pointer
> >> >>> >> > to an empty row for all eternity.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > -Kal
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Aaron Morton
> >> >>> >> > <aa...@thelastpickle.com>
> >> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> Deleting all the columns in a row via TTL has the same affect
> as
> >> >>> >> >> deleting th
> >> >>> >> >> row, the data will physically by removed during compaction.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Aaron
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On 08 Feb, 2011,at 10:24 AM, Bill Speirs <
> bill.spe...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> I don't think this is supported (but I could be completely
> >> >>> >> >> wrong).
> >> >>> >> >> However, I'd love to see this functionality as well.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> How would one go about requesting such a feature?
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Bill-
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Kallin Nagelberg
> >> >>> >> >> <kallin.nagelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>> Hey,
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> I have read about the new TTL columns in Cassandra 0.7. In my
> >> >>> >> >>> case
> >> >>> >> >>> I'd
> >> >>> >> >>> like to expire an entire row automatically after a certain
> >> >>> >> >>> amount
> >> >>> >> >>> of
> >> >>> >> >>> time. Is this possible as well?
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> >> >>> -Kal
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to