Thanks Anand. Let's keep exchanging our experiences. -Naren
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Anand Somani <meatfor...@gmail.com> wrote: > At this point we are not in production, in the lab only. The longest test > so far has been about 2-3 days, the datasize at this point is about 2-3 TB > per node, we have 2 nodes. We do see spikes to high response times (and > timeouts), which seemed to be around the time GC kicks in. We were pushing > the system as much as we can. Also given our application we can do major > compactions at night, have not tried it on this big data set yet. We do > still have minor compactions turned on. > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Narendra Sharma < > narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Anand. Few questions: >> - What is the size of nodes (in terms for data)? >> - How long have you been running? >> - Howz compaction treating you? >> >> Thanks, >> Naren >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Anand Somani <meatfor...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Using it for storing large immutable objects, like Aaron was suggesting >>> we are splitting the blob across multiple columns. Also we are reading it a >>> few columns at a time (for memory considerations). Currently we have only >>> gone upto about 300-400KB size objects. >>> >>> We do have machines with 32Gb memory and with 8G for java. Row cache is >>> disabled. There is some latency that needs to be sorted out, but overall I >>> am positive. This is with 6.6, am in the process of moving it to 0.7. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Narendra Sharma < >>> narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone using Cassandra for storing large number (millions) of large >>>> (mostly immutable) objects (200KB-5MB size each)? I would like to >>>> understand >>>> the experience in general considering that Cassandra is not considered a >>>> good fit for large objects. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-265 >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Naren >>>> >>> >>> >> >
