Perhaps. I use hector. I have an bit of rework to do moving from .6 to .7. This is something I wasn't anticipating in my earlier planning. Had Pelops been around when I started using Hector, I would have probably chosen it over Hector. The Pelops client seemed to be better conceived as far as programmer experience and simplicity went. Since then, Hector has had a "v2" upgrade to their API which breaks much of the things that you would have done in version .6 and before. Conceptually speaking, they appear more similar now than before the Hector changes.
I'm dreading having to do a significant amount of work on my client interface because of the incompatible API changes.. but I will have to in order to get my client/server caught up to the currently supported branch. That is just part of the cost of doing business with Cassandra at the moment. Hopefully after "1.0" on the server and some of the clients, this type of thing will be more unusual. 2011/1/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@gmail.com>: > Thanks everyone. I guess, I should go with hector > > On 18 Jan 2011 17:41, "Alois Bělaška" <alois.bela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Definitelly Pelops https://github.com/s7/scale7-pelops >> >> 2011/1/18 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@gmail.com> >> >>> What is the most commonly used java client library? Which is the the most >>> mature/feature complete? >>> Noble >>> >
