Shimi, I am using Hector to do exactly what you want to do, with no problems.
(In fact, the question didn't even occur to me...) On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Ran Tavory <ran...@gmail.com> wrote: > This should be the case, yes, semantics isn't affected by the > connection and state isn't kept. What might happen if you read/write > with low consistency levels then when you hit a different host on the > ring it might have an inconsistent state in case of partition. > > On Sunday, December 12, 2010, shimi <shim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So if I will use a different connection (thrift via Hector), will I get > the same results? It's make sense when you use OPP and I assume it is the > same with RP. I just wanted to make sure this is the case and there is no > state which is kept. > > > > Shimi > > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Peter Schuller < > peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote: > > > >> Is the same connection is required when iterating over all the rows with > >> Random Paritioner or is it possible to use a different connection for > each > >> iteration? > > > > In general, the choice of RPC connection (I assume you mean the > > underlying thrift connection) does not affect the semantics of the RPC > > calls. > > > > -- > > / Peter Schuller > > > > > > > > -- > /Ran >
