As far as I know they are adding a clusterized semaphore on next version.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Germán Kondolf <german.kond...@gmail.com>wrote: > I don't know much about Zookeeper, but as far as I read, it is out of > JVM process. > Hazelcast is just a framework and you can programmatically start and > shutdown the cluster, it's just an xml to configure it. > > Hazelcast also provides good caching features to integrate with > Hibernate, distributed executors, clusterized queues, distributed > events, and so on. I don't know if that is supported by Zookeeper, I > think not, because is not the main goal of it. > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:49 PM, B. Todd Burruss <bburr...@real.com> > wrote: > > thx for the feedback. regarding locking, has anyone done a comparison to > > zookeeper? does zookeeper provide functionality over hazelcast? > > > > On 12/10/2010 11:08 AM, Norman Maurer wrote: > >> > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I'm not using it atm but plan to in my next project. It really looks > nice > >> :) > >> > >> Bye, > >> Norman > >> > >> 2010/12/10 Germán Kondolf<german.kond...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> Hi, I'm using it as a complement of cassandra, to avoid "duplicate" > >>> searches and duplicate content in a given moment in time. > >>> It works really nice by now, no critical issues, at least the > >>> functionallity I'm using from it. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> //GK > >>> german.kond...@gmail.com > >>> // sites > >>> http://twitter.com/germanklf > >>> http://ar.linkedin.com/in/germankondolf > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, B. Todd Burruss<bburr...@real.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.hazelcast.com/product.jsp > >>>> > >>>> has anyone tested hazelcast as a distributed locking mechanism for > java > >>>> clients? seems very attractive on the surface. > >>>> > > > > > > -- > //GK > german.kond...@gmail.com > // sites > http://twitter.com/germanklf > http://www.facebook.com/germanklf > http://ar.linkedin.com/in/germankondolf >
