Miliseconds - but that's not the problem - I can wait 10 minutes and still not 
get the value updated!  Other times I can update many times a second - it just 
seems random!

From: Tyler Hobbs [mailto:ty...@riptano.com]
Sent: 17 November 2010 22:28
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: casssandra 0.7beta3, pycassa and windows client timestamps

What resolution does time.time() give you in Windows?

- Tyler
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Dr. Andrew Perella 
<a...@eutechnyx.com<mailto:a...@eutechnyx.com>> wrote:
I have encountered a strange problem with values not being written to Cassandra 
very often.
It looks like it is a windows client timestamp problem. I cannot detect a 
pattern as to when a timestamp will allow an update however if I run my client 
(in a web server) on linux then the problem goes away.

Has anyone seen anything like this or will I need to delve deeper into thift?

FYI I am using pythons int(time.time()*1e6) as a timestamp

Best Regards,
Andrew

This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and 
used only by the intended recipient. No communication sent by e-mail to or from 
Eutechnyx is intended to give rise to contractual or other legal liability, 
apart from liability which cannot be excluded under English law.

This email has been scanned for all known viruses by 
www.epagency.net<http://www.epagency.net>.
www.eutechnyx.com<http://www.eutechnyx.com> Eutechnyx Limited. Registered in 
England No: 2172322


This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the Email Protection Agency
This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and 
used only by the intended recipient. No communication sent by e-mail to or from 
Eutechnyx is intended to give rise to contractual or other legal liability, 
apart from liability which cannot be excluded under English law. 

This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the Email Protection 
Agency. http://www.epagency.net


www.eutechnyx.com Eutechnyx Limited. Registered in England No: 2172322

Reply via email to