And I'm still getting UnavailableException and TimedOutException when there Cassandra daemon is doing either Compaction or Garbage collection...
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Rana Aich <aichr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I ran the nodetool cleanup...but the scenario doesn't change... > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> After nodetool move you have to run nodetool cleanup. >> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Rana Aich <aichr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I have arranged my initial tokens and get this result: >> > Address Status Load Range >> > Ring >> > >> > 170141183460469231731687303715880000000 >> > 192.168.202.1 Up 208.39 GB >> > 34028236692093846346337460743177000000 |<--| >> > 192.168.202.2 Up 333.52 GB >> > 68056473384187692692674921486354000000 | ^ >> > 192.168.202.3 Up 333.49 GB >> > 102084710076281539039012382229530000000 v | >> > 192.168.202.4 Up 333.59 GB >> > 136112946768375385385349842972710000000 | ^ >> > 192.168.202.201Up 208.41 GB >> > 144620005941398846971934208158500000000 v | >> > 192.168.202.202Up 83.32 GB >> > 153127065114422308558518573344300000000 | ^ >> > 192.168.202.203Up 83.3 GB >> > 161634124287445770145102938530090000000 v | >> > 192.168.202.204Up 83.38 GB >> > 170141183460469231731687303715880000000 |--> >> > The the range is calculated as follows: >> > 1st Initial Token 2^127 * 0.2, >> > 2nd Initial Token 2^127 * 0.4, >> > 3rd Initial Token 2^127 * 0.6, >> > 4th Initial Token 2^127 * 0.8, >> > 5th Initial Token 2^127 * 0.85, >> > 6th Initial Token 2^127 * 0.9, >> > 7th Initial Token 2^127 * 0.95 >> > 8th Initial Token 2^127 * 1.0 >> > With the top four boxes having 80% of disk space. And the bottom 4 >> having >> > 20% of the total. >> > However as the nodetool shows my 5th box (Lowend Box) has 208.41 GB >> > (expected result ~ 83 GB) with 73% of the capacity already utilized. >> Other 3 >> > Lowend boxes (~83GB) are behaving properly. >> > Does anyone have any clue? >> >> >> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Oleg Anastasyev <olega...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Rana Aich <aichrana <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Yet my nodetool shows the following: >> >> > >> >> > 192.168.202.202Down 319.94 GB >> >> > 7200044730783885730400843868815072654 >> >> |<--| >> >> > 192.168.202.4 Up 382.39 GB >> >> > 23719654286404067863958492664769598669 >> >> | ^ >> >> > 192.168.202.2 Up 106.81 GB >> >> > 36701505058375526444137310055285336988 >> >> v | >> >> > 192.168.202.3 Up 149.81 GB >> >> > 65098486053779167479528707238121707074 >> >> | ^ >> >> > 192.168.202.201Up 154.72 GB >> >> > 79420606800360567885560534277526521273 >> >> v | >> >> > 192.168.202.204Up 72.91 GB >> >> > 85219217446418416293334453572116009608 >> >> | ^ >> >> > 192.168.202.1 Up 29.78 GB >> >> > 87632302962564279114105239858760976120 >> >> v | >> >> > 192.168.202.203Up 9.35 GB >> >> > 87790520647700936489181912967436646309 >> >> |-->| >> >> >> >> It seems you did not configured tokens in your ring at all - automatic >> >> configuration is useless in practice. >> >> If you used random partitioning, for 8 nodes cluster these token >> >> configuration >> >> seems more reasonable: >> >> 1: 0 >> >> 2: 21267647932558653966460912964485513216 >> >> 3: 42535295865117307932921825928971026432 >> >> 4: 63802943797675961899382738893456539648 >> >> 5: 85070591730234615865843651857942052864 >> >> 6: 106338239662793269832304564822427566080 >> >> 7: 127605887595351923798765477786913079296 >> >> 8: 148873535527910577765226390751398592512 >> >> >> >> You can generate token configuration for any cluster size by using tool >> >> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/cassandra_tokens.py >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
