Is this also true for RackAware with alternating nodes from 2 datacenters on the ring?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > if you're using RackUnawareStrategy that should work. > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Doubleday > <daniel.double...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > just wanted to make sure that I get this right: > > > > What this means is that I have to schedule repairs only on every RFs > node? > > > > So with 4 nodes and RF=2 I would repair nodes 1 and 3 > > > > and with 6 nodes and RF=3 I would repair nodes 1 and 4 > > > > and that would lead to a synched cluster? > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:54 PM, B. Todd Burruss <bburr...@real.com> > wrote: > >> if i have N=3 and run nodetool repair on node X. i assume that merkle > >> trees (at a minimum) are calculated on nodes X, X+1, and X+2 (since > >> N=3). when the repair is finished are nodes X, X+1, and X+2 all in sync > >> with respect to node X's data? > > > > yes. > > > > -- > > Jonathan Ellis > > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > > co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support > > http://riptano.com > > > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Ellis > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support > http://riptano.com >
