On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Michael Dürgner <mich...@duergner.de> wrote: > The thing about slow on joins is true (we experience that ourselves) but > still I wonder myself, why you use cassandra for the indices. Can't you just > store them in MySQL although? >
...and then shard and shard and shard to deal with hundreds of millions or billions of rows? That's usually the trade-off. Both can be made to work, but neither is free. b
