FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1145 Yes, it's a bug. CL.ONE is a reasonable work around.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Mike Malone <m...@simplegeo.com> wrote: > I think the answer to your question is no, you shouldn't. > I'm feeling far too lazy to do even light research on the topic, but I > remember there being a bug where replicas weren't consolidated and you'd get > a result set that included data from each replica that was consulted for a > query. That could be what you're seeing. Are you running the most recent > release? Trying dropping to CL.ONE and see if you only get one copy. If that > fixes it, I'd suggest searching JIRA. > Mike > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Shook <jsh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Should I ever expect multiples of the same key (with non-empty column >> sets) from the same get_range_slices call? >> I've verified that the column data is identical byte-for-byte, as >> well, including column timestamps? > >
