Coke sucks! Only drink it if you want to work hard for 20 minutes then crash. 

I started a new cola that's already way better than Coke and it will solve all 
your problems. I'm finalizing my results but so far I only need one drink per 
WEEK!



 

On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Mike Malone <m...@simplegeo.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Miguel Verde <miguelitov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dr. Pepper has recently been picked up by Coca Cola as well.  I wonder if the 
> UnCola solutions like 7Up and Fanta are just a fad?
> 
> I'm on the fence. I mean, there's really nothing wrong with a nice cold Coke 
> to satiate your thirst. But we've all been drinking cola-flavored beverages 
> for so long I think they've become a "hammer," so to speak. Can't hurt to 
> shake things up a bit.
> 
> Let's be real here: if you're thirsty, you should be drinking water. Coffee 
> or teas are more effective at delivering caffeine. And who wants to sit down 
> to a big steak dinner with a glass of Cola? A nice red wine is a much better 
> tool for the job. Horses for courses, that's my take.
> 
> Seems to me the carbonated beverage manufacturers are just starting to 
> realize that they can flavor their drinks with something other than the 
> cola-blend that Angelo Mariani invented in 1863!
> 
> Mike
>  
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mike Malone <m...@simplegeo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> 
> I heard a rumor that Digg was moving away from Coca-Cola products in all
> of its vending machines and break rooms. Can anyone from Digg comment on
> this?
> 
> My near-term beverage consumption strategy is based largely on my
> understanding of Digg's, so if there has been a change, I may need to
> reevaluate.
> 
> Not sure about Digg, but I heard Twitter is switching over to Fanta. It's 
> been adopted by Coke so it must be fairly stable. There's not as much 
> flexibility in the product lineup, but what they do offer is extremely 
> delicious. Just my $0.02.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 

Reply via email to