1. Performance data of network storage elements which may be required for performance tuning. 2. Data dictionaries. 3. Satellite communications. 4. General search applications.
etc..... below is the performance statistics compared to traditional Databases. MySQL Comparison *MySQL > 50 GB Data Writes Average : ~300 ms Reads Average : ~350 ms *Cassandra > 50 GB Data Writes Average : 0.12 ms Reads Average : 15 ms Regards, Sharan 2010/6/1 史英杰 <shiyingjie1...@gmail.com> > Thanks, but would you please describe it in more details, because most > applications require fast response for retrieval. > > 2010/6/1 sharanabasava raddi <shivub...@gmail.com> > > The applications which require bigger storage and fast response for >> retrieval. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:13 PM, 史英杰 <shiyingjie1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi,ALL >>> I found that most applications on Cassandra are for web >>> applications, such as store friiend information or digg information, and >>> they get good performance, many companies or groups want to move their >>> applications to Cassandra, so which kind of applications are Cassandra fit >>> for? Thanks a lot! >>> >>> Yingjie >>> >> >> >
