Hi
Can we make range search on ID:ID format as this would be treated as
single ID by API or can it bifurcate on ':' . If now then how do can
we ignore usage of supercolumns where we need to associate 'n' number
of rows to a single ID.
Like
CatID1-> articleID1
CatID1-> articleID2
CatID1-> articleID3
CatID1-> articleID4
How can we map such scenarios with simple column families.
Rgds.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Torsten Curdt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly.
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:20, David Boxenhorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Don't think of it as getting rid of supercolum. Think of it as adding
>> superdupercolums, supertriplecolums, etc. Or, in sparse array terminology:
>> array[dim1][dim2][dim3].....[dimN] = value
>>
>> Or, as said above:
>>
>> <Column Name="ThingThatsNowKey" Indexed="True" ClusterPartitioned="True"
>> Type="UTF8">
>> <Column Name="ThingThatsNowColumnFamily" DiskPartitioned="True"
>> Type="UTF8">
>> <Column Name="ThingThatsNowSuperColumnName" Type="Long">
>> <Column Name="ThingThatsNowColumnName" Indexed="True" Type="ASCII">
>> <Column Name="ThingThatCantCurrentlyBeRepresented"/>
>> </Column>
>> </Column>
>> </Column>
>> </Column>
>
