What is the complete code string you are using to connect with cassandra from Java code
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:49 PM, David Boxenhorn <da...@lookin2.com> wrote: > I don't know what "TSocket or the buffered one" means. Maybe I should know? > > I'm using Hector. Does that explain anything? > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:15 AM, vd <vineetdan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> what is it that you are using to connect with cassnadra TSocket or the >> buffered one ? >> >> >> ____________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:29 PM, David Boxenhorn <da...@lookin2.com>wrote: >> >>> I'm running Java on the client, jdbc queries on Oracle, Hector on >>> Cassandra. >>> >>> The Cassandra and Oracle database designs are radically different, as you >>> might guess. >>> >>> I have no doubt that Cassandra can be tuned, in a multiple-server >>> cluster, to have superior throughput (that's why I'm doing it!). But for >>> now, it's really frustrating my development effort that Cassandra is so >>> slow. Can't I get it up to twice as slow as Oracle in my configuration? >>> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:47 AM, vd <vineetdan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi David >>>> >>>> If I may ask...how do you plan to import data from oracle to cassandra ? >>>> As answer AFAIK cassandra's true ability comes into play when running on >>>> more than one machine...and please share how you are making comparisons >>>> like >>>> on writes or reads from cassandra. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________ >>>> _______________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:04 PM, David Boxenhorn <da...@lookin2.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm running Oracle and Cassandra on my machine, trying to import my >>>>> data to Cassandra from Oracle. >>>>> >>>>> In my configuration Oracle is about ten times faster than Cassandra. >>>>> Cassandra has out-of-the-box tuning. >>>>> >>>>> I am new to Cassandra. How do I begin trying to tune it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
