Well it wasn't used for any critical operations. So there is no way to have figured what impact it did or did not have.
Avinash On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Cagatay Kavukcuoglu <caga...@kavukcuoglu.org > wrote: > Did removing Trove collections have a noticeable effect on performance > or memory use at the time? > > On Tuesday, May 4, 2010, Avinash Lakshman <avinash.laksh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hahaha, Jeff - I remember scampering to remove those references to the > Trove maps, I think around 2 years ago. > > Avinash > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher <ham...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > Hey, > > > > History repeating itself a bit, here: one delay in getting Cassandra into > the open source world was removing its use of the Trove collections library, > as the license (LGPL) is not compatible with the Apache 2.0 license. > > > > Later, > > Jeff > > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Tatu Saloranta <tsalora...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez > > <carlos.sanc...@riskmetrics.com> wrote: > >> There are forEach methods in that would allow you to travel the > keys/values/entries w/o creating the extra object (entries) > > > > Ok. So if change was made, it'd make sense to ensure those were used > > for traversal. Thanks! > > > > -+ Tatu +- > > > > > > > > > > -- > CK. >
