Hello, It seems that I have experienced network problems (local pre-installed firewall) and some rest http inefficiencies, so I think that it behaves the same in both cases. I am sorry to have taken from your time. Best regards, Daniel.
На 30 април 2010 20:46, Даниел Симеонов <dsimeo...@gmail.com> написа: > Hi, > I've checked two similar scenarios and one of them seem to be more > performant. So timestamped data is being appended, the first use case is > with an OPP and new rows being created every with only one column (there are > about 7-8 CFs). The second cases is to have rows with more columns and > RandomPartitioner, although every row gets much more than one column > appended yet the inserts are relatively uniformly distributed among rows. > Yet the first scenario is faster than the second, and the second one starts > with good response times (about 20-30 ms) and gradually the mean time > increases (to about 150-200 ms). What could be the reason? > Thank you very much! > Best regards, Daniel. >
