Yes, Lucas was correct about the nature of my original question. I'm glad to hear that Justin's solution works, it makes for a much simpler schema.
Ed On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Lucas Di Pentima <lu...@di-pentima.com.ar>wrote: > > El 27/04/2010, a las 18:23, Lee Parker escribió: > > > I have used the solution presented by Justin and it works just fine. > When you construct a TimeUUID with a specific timestamp and use that for > the start or finish of the range slice, cassandra will use the timestamp > embedded in the UUID even if that specific UUID doesn't exist in the index. > It is not an ideal solution because the timestamp you pass in may not have > the same granularity as the one used to create your current indexes. So, > you might be using a standard unix epoch timestamp in seconds, while a true > TimeUUID uses 100 nanosecond slices of time. > > > I've tried it and am amazed of this feature, I don't know why I supposed > that wouldn't work, thanks Lee & Justin!!! :) > > -- > Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina > Jabber: lu...@di-pentima.com.ar > MSN: ldipent...@hotmail.com > > > > >
