I'd like to get something besides "I'm seeing close wait but i have no
idea why" for a bug report, since most people aren't seeing that.

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Ingram Chen <ingramc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I trace IncomingStreamReader source and found that incoming socket comes
> from MessagingService$SocketThread.
> but there is no close() call on either accepted socket or socketChannel.
>
> Should I file a bug report ?
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:02, Ingram Chen <ingramc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> this happened after several hours of operations and both nodes are started
>> at the same time (clean start without any data). so it might not relate to
>> Bootstrap.
>>
>> In system.log I do not see any logs like "xxx node dead" or exceptions.
>> and both nodes in test are alive. they serve read/write well, too. Below
>> four connections between nodes are keep healthy from time to time.
>>
>> tcp        0      0 ::ffff:192.168.2.87:7000
>> ::ffff:192.168.2.88:58447   ESTABLISHED
>> tcp        0      0 ::ffff:192.168.2.87:54986
>> ::ffff:192.168.2.88:7000    ESTABLISHED
>> tcp        0      0 ::ffff:192.168.2.87:59138
>> ::ffff:192.168.2.88:7000    ESTABLISHED
>> tcp        0      0 ::ffff:192.168.2.87:7000
>> ::ffff:192.168.2.88:39074   ESTABLISHED
>>
>> so connections end in CLOSE_WAIT should be newly created. (for streaming
>> ?) This seems related to streaming issues we suffered recently:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/busy-thread-on-IncomingStreamReader-td4908640.html
>>
>> I would like add some debug codes around opening and closing of socket to
>> find out what happend.
>>
>> Could you give me some hint, about what classes I should take look ?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:47, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this after doing a bootstrap or other streaming operation?  Or did
>>> a node go down?
>>>
>>> The internal sockets are supposed to remain open, otherwise.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Ingram Chen <ingramc...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Thank your information.
>>> >
>>> > We do use connection pools with thrift client and ThriftAdress is on
>>> > port
>>> > 9160.
>>> >
>>> > Those problematic connections we found are all in port 7000, which is
>>> > internal communications port between
>>> > nodes. I guess this related to StreamingService.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 23:46, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ingram Chen <ingramc...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     We have observed several connections between nodes in CLOSE_WAIT
>>> >>> after several hours of operation:
>>> >>
>>> >> This is symptomatic of not pooling your client connections correctly.
>>> >>  Be
>>> >> sure you're using one connection per thread, not one connection per
>>> >> operation.
>>> >> -Brandon
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Ingram Chen
>>> > online share order: http://dinbendon.net
>>> > blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ingram Chen
>> online share order: http://dinbendon.net
>> blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
>
>
>
> --
> Ingram Chen
> online share order: http://dinbendon.net
> blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
>

Reply via email to