The jit on debian may take longer to warm up by default.

Do 100k ops first before benchmarking.

Benchmark with multiple threads.

And use a known benchmark first like py_stress.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Heath Oderman <he...@526valley.com> wrote:
> What's interesting for my case is that I put a timer around the thrift
> method to insert_batch
>
> Every iteration of that call against debian (any hardware, same network or
> in amazon cloud with windows machine in ec2 as well) takes 400,000 ticks.
> Super consistent.  One thread.
>
> My friends setup with cassandra on osx takes 400,000 ticks for the first
> insert, vthen drops to 20,000 ticks for every consecutive call.
>
> That's what is so strange.
>
> On Apr 9, 2010 12:15 PM, "Mark Jones" <mjo...@imagehawk.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like we are some experiencing the same problems. (I’m using 0.6RC1) I
> have a 3 node cluster with 8GB/machine (dual core CPU).  I’m peaking on
> inserts at about 6000-7000/second running 40 threads.  Separate spindles for
> commitlog and data…..
>
>
>
> My read speed is atrocious, 800/sec sustained (starts off at 1800+/second
> and falls back to 800/sec).  Of course that is only if I read from the
> “correct” node.  Depending on the moment, 2 of the nodes will return
> 1-2/second instead of 800, and only one node will return 800/second.  And if
> I spread the reads across many nodes, all the performance drops.   nodetool
> loadbalance can change which node is the “golden” node, but I don’t know
> why.  I have doubled the # of concurrent read threads and seen some
> performance improvement, (that was the last thing I tried, and eeked out
> another 150/second)
>
>
>
> So much about Cassandra makes we WANT it to work, I mean look at the fact
> that all nodes are essentially equal, that it replicates from rack to rack,
> from DC to DC, now, if I could just make it perform.
>
>
>
> My machines are basically idle (a large amount of IOWait, but the time is
> spent in the pending queue, vs the device svctime).  So far I’ve got little
> insight into what could be wrong, I’ve increased the key cache 10X using
> JConsole but the hit rate is still at times abysmal.
>
>
>
> I’m writing 400-800 byte blobs with an 8 byte key (supercolumn) and a 12
> byte “subkey”, then a 5 byte column name, something that would seem to be
> right up Cassandra’s alley.
>
>
>
> Right now I’m reworking my test to dump it into MySQL on the same machines,
> so I can compare the two for speed, because either I’ve got crap for
> hardware, or there is something rotten in Denmark.
>
>
>
> From: Heath Oderman [mailto:he...@526valley.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 10:40 AM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Very new user needs some troubleshooting pointers
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Jonathan!
>
>
>
> I started with multi threaded tests, but when my performance...

Reply via email to