On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Mike Gallamore <mike.e.gallam...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hello. If you are doing exactly the same thing as N::C::Easy (ie a join on > the gettimeofday). Then you should have the same problem I found a fix for. > The problem is that the microseconds value isn't zero padded. So if you are > at say 23s 25 micro seconds you get a date: 2325. not 23000025 which of > course means that sometimes your next timestamp will be "older" than your > previous one. Here is a patch to N::C::Easy that fixes this and hopefully a > similar thing will fix your code.
All maintainers of competing libraries should be so helpful. :-)
