On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, banks <bankse...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then from an IT standpoint, if i'm using a RF of 3, it stands to reason that > running on Raid 1 makes sense, since RAID and RF achieve the same ends... it > makes sense to strip for speed and let cassandra deal with redundancy, eh?
Isn't it RAID-0 that's for pure speed? Paul Prescod
