Okay, so should I run any more commands like cleanup before?

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bootstrap source restarting will always fail bootstrap.  You'll need
> to restart the blue one too now, I'm afraid.
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Dan Di Spaltro <dan.dispal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Before the Red one rebooted it had 1 active STREAM-STAGE.  Now it has 0
> in
> > STREAM-STAGE.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Dan Di Spaltro <dan.dispal...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Red one.
> >> Gary - both say nothing is happening with no destinations or sources.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> which node rebooted, the red one, or the blue one?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Dan Di Spaltro <
> dan.dispal...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > So we are adding another node to the cluster with the latest 0.6
> branch
> >>> > (RC1).  It seems to be hung in some limbo state.
> >>> > Before bootstrapping our cluster had 50-60GB spread fairly evenly
> >>> > across 4
> >>> > machines, with RF=3.   One machine had more load than the others, and
> >>> > sure
> >>> > enough bootstrapping selected that node.   That is the red machine.
> >>> >  The
> >>> > light blue machine is the new machine.
> >>> > I have attached a graph to illustrate when the bootstrap process
> >>> > started.
> >>> > In jconsole the streamingservice status was "performing
> >>> > anticompaction..."
> >>> > for over 18-24 hrs.  It is currently in "nothing is happening".   It
> >>> > did
> >>> > have 1 active STREAM-STAGE task, but the machine had to be rebooted
> for
> >>> > something unrelated to cassandra. Now the light blue machine appears
> to
> >>> > be
> >>> > getting data, but its growing at virtually the same rate as the other
> >>> > machines which makes me think it is part of the cluster and not
> >>> > actually
> >>> > streaming data from the machine its supposed to.
> >>> > Any other ideas on how to debug?
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Dan Di Spaltro
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dan Di Spaltro
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Di Spaltro
> >
>



-- 
Dan Di Spaltro

Reply via email to