Ok - so I guess that between 1400 and 3500 inserts per second is reasonably good results -- we are going to continue working on our custom code but it seems like we need a design that uses lots of row-keys and fewer column family keys and is heavily threaded.
Thanks for your help in pointing out this utility/test harness. On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Scott White <scottbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, that's what I meant, thanks for the correction. > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Scott White <scottbl...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Yep I believe those are inserts per second. Take the last line: >>> >>> "811653,1666,250" >>> >>> I believe that's telling you that during that 10 second interval you did >>> 1666 inserts but your overall insert rate is 811653/250 = 3246.612 >>> inserts/sec. >>> >> >> Actually it averaged 1666 inserts per second in that 10 second interval, >> but you're correct on the average. >> >> -Brandon >> > >
