Does using --experiments=use_deprecated_read have any effect?

On 5/16/24 14:30, Yarden BenMoshe wrote:
Hi Jan, my PipelineOptions is as follows:
options.setStreaming(true);
options.setAttachedMode(false);
options.setRunner(FlinkRunner.class);

I've also tried adding:
options.setAutoWatermarkInterval(100L);
as seen in some github issue, without any success so far.

other than that, i am working with parallelism:3 and number of task slots: 3

Thanks!
Yarden

‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 16 במאי 2024 ב-15:05 מאת ‪Jan Lukavský‬‏ <‪[email protected]‬‏>:‬

    Hi Yarden,

    can you please provide all flink-related PipelineOptions you use
    for the
    job?

      Jan

    On 5/16/24 13:44, Yarden BenMoshe wrote:
    > Hi all,
    > I have a project running with Beam 2.51, using Flink runner. In
    one of
    > my pipelines i have a FixedWindow and had a problem upgrading until
    > now, with a timers issue now resolved, and hopefully allowing me to
    > upgrade to version 2.56
    > However, I encounter another problem now which I believe is
    related to
    > watermarking(?).
    > My pipeline's source is a kafka topic.
    > My basic window definition is:
    >
    > PCollection<KV<String, Iterable<CustomObject>>>
    windowCustomObjectInfo
    > = customObject.apply("windowCustomObjectInfo",
    >
    
Window.into(FixedWindows.of(Duration.standardSeconds(60)))).apply(GroupByKey.create());
    >
    > and ever since upgrading to version 2.56 I am not getting any
    output
    > from that window. when enabling TRACE logs, i have this message:
    >
    > 2024-05-12 13:50:55,257 TRACE
    org.apache.beam.sdk.util.WindowTracing
    > [] - WatermarkHold.addHolds: element hold at
    2024-05-12T13:50:59.999Z
    > is on time for key:test-12345;
    > window:[2024-05-12T13:50:00.000Z..2024-05-12T13:51:00.000Z);
    > inputWatermark:-290308-12-21T19:59:05.225Z;
    > outputWatermark:-290308-12-21T19:59:05.225Z
    >
    >
    > Any hints on where should I look or maybe how I can adjust my
    window
    > definition? Are you familiar with any change that might be the
    cause
    > for my issue?
    > Thanks

Reply via email to