Alexey yes! here it is:

    import lombok.*;
    import lombok.extern.jackson.Jacksonized;

    import java.io.Serializable;
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.Map;

    @Jacksonized
    @Builder
    @Getter
    @Value
    @EqualsAndHashCode
    @ToString
    public class InboundData implements Serializable {

        String payload;
        Map<String, String> attributes;
        List<Store> stores;
    }


------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, March 23rd, 2023 at 8:14 AM, Alexey Romanenko 
<aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote:


> Could you share a class declaration of your InboundData class? Is it just a 
> POJO?
> 
> —
> Alexey
> 
> > On 23 Mar 2023, at 08:16, Juan Cuzmar jcuz...@protonmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I hope this message finds you well. I am currently working with Apache 
> > Beam's JdbcIO and need some guidance regarding setting a coder for the 
> > input data without resorting to the deprecated withCoder method. I've been 
> > trying to resolve this issue and would appreciate any insights or 
> > recommendations from the community.
> > 
> > Here's a snippet of my code:
> > 
> > .apply("Inserting", JdbcIO.<PubsubMessage, InboundData>readAll()
> > .withDataSourceProviderFn(DataSourceProvider.of(dbConfig))
> > ...
> > .withRowMapper(resultSet -> {
> > // Mapping logic here
> > }).withOutputParallelization(false)
> > ).setCoder(SerializableCoder.of(InboundData.class))
> > 
> > When I run the code, I encounter the following error:
> > 
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to infer a coder for 
> > JdbcIO.readAll() transform.
> > ...
> > 
> > I understand that the withCoder method is marked as deprecated and should 
> > be avoided. Therefore, I would like to know the recommended way to set the 
> > coder for JdbcIO, considering the deprecated status of withCoder.
> > 
> > If there are any specific coding practices or conventions that I should 
> > follow when posting code snippets or emphasizing certain aspects, please 
> > let me know, and I'll be sure to adhere to them in the future.
> > 
> > Thank you for your time and assistance.
> > 
> > Best regards!

Reply via email to