Thanks for the replies, Lukasz and Steve!

Steve: do you have a link to the google client api wrappers (I'm not sure
if I know what they are.)

Thank you!

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:04 AM Steve Niemitz <sniem...@apache.org> wrote:

> We use the Dataflow API [1] directly, via the google api client wrappers
> (both python and java), pretty extensively.  It works well and doesn't
> require a dependency on beam.
>
> [1] https://cloud.google.com/dataflow/docs/reference/rest
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:56 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> It is your best way to do this right now and this hasn't changed in a
>> while (region was added to project and job ids in the past 6 years).
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM Peter Littig <plit...@nianticlabs.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the reply, Kyle.
>>>
>>> The DataflowClient::getJob method uses a Dataflow instance that's
>>> provided at construction time (via
>>> DataflowPipelineOptions::getDataflowClient). If that Dataflow instance can
>>> be obtained from a minimal instance of the options (i.e., containing only
>>> the project ID and region) then it looks like everything should work.
>>>
>>> I suppose a secondary question here is whether or not this approach is
>>> the recommended way to solve my problem (but I don't know of any
>>> alternatives).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:55 AM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > I think the answer is to use a DataflowClient in the second service,
>>>> but creating one requires DataflowPipelineOptions. Are these options
>>>> supposed to be exactly the same as those used by the first service? Or do
>>>> only some of the fields have to be the same?
>>>>
>>>> Most options are not necessary for retrieving a job. In general,
>>>> Dataflow jobs can always be uniquely identified by the project, region and
>>>> job ID.
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/ecedd3e654352f1b51ab2caae0fd4665403bd0eb/runners/google-cloud-dataflow-java/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/dataflow/DataflowClient.java#L100
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:31 AM Peter Littig <plit...@nianticlabs.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Beam users!
>>>>>
>>>>> Suppose I want to build two (Java) services, one that launches
>>>>> (long-running) dataflow jobs, and the other that monitors the status of
>>>>> dataflow jobs. Within a single service, I could simply track a
>>>>> PipelineResult for each dataflow run and periodically call getState. How
>>>>> can I monitor job status like this from a second, independent service?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the answer is to use a DataflowClient in the second service,
>>>>> but creating one requires DataflowPipelineOptions. Are these options
>>>>> supposed to be exactly the same as those used by the first service? Or do
>>>>> only some of the fields have to be the same?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe there's a better alternative than DataflowClient?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to