I would expect the following line to fail:

        List<TableRow> h = ((List<TableRow>) bigQueryRow.get("hits"));

The top-level bigQueryRow will be a TableRow, but `bigQueryRow.get("hits")`
is only guaranteed to be an instance of some class that implements `Map`.
So that line needs to become:

        List<Map<String, Object> h = ((List<Map<String, Object>)
bigQueryRow.get("hits"));

And then your constructor for Hit must accept a Map<String, Object> rather
than a TableRow.

I imagine that TableRow is only intended to be used as a top-level object.
Each row you get from a BQ result is a TableRow, but objects nested inside
it are not logically table rows; they're BQ structs that are modeled as
maps in JSON and Map<String, Object> in Java.

Are you manually constructing TableRow objects with nested TableRows? I
would expect that a result from BigQueryIO.read() would give a TableRow
with some other map type for nested structs, so I'm surprised that this
cast works in some contexts.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:44 PM Kirill Zhdanovich <[email protected]>
wrote:

>    I changed code a little bit not to use lambdas.
>
>    Session(TableRow bigQueryRow, ProductCatalog productCatalog) {
>         List<TableRow> h = ((List<TableRow>) bigQueryRow.get("hits"));
>         List<Hit> hits = new ArrayList<>();
>
>         for (TableRow tableRow : h) { <-- breaks here
>             hits.add(new Hit(tableRow));
>         }
>         ...
>     }
>
> Stack trace
>
> java.lang.ClassCastException: class java.util.LinkedHashMap cannot be cast
> to class com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow
> (java.util.LinkedHashMap is in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap';
> com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow is in unnamed module of
> loader 'app')
> org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline$PipelineExecutionException:
> java.lang.ClassCastException: class java.util.LinkedHashMap cannot be cast
> to class com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow
> (java.util.LinkedHashMap is in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap';
> com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow is in unnamed module of
> loader 'app')
> at
> org.apache.beam.runners.direct.DirectRunner$DirectPipelineResult.waitUntilFinish(DirectRunner.java:348)
> at
> org.apache.beam.runners.direct.DirectRunner$DirectPipelineResult.waitUntilFinish(DirectRunner.java:318)
> at org.apache.beam.runners.direct.DirectRunner.run(DirectRunner.java:213)
> at org.apache.beam.runners.direct.DirectRunner.run(DirectRunner.java:67)
> at org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline.run(Pipeline.java:315)
> at org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.TestPipeline.run(TestPipeline.java:350)
> at org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.TestPipeline.run(TestPipeline.java:331)
> at
> com.ikea.search.ab.bootstrap.JobTest.testNumberOfSessionsIsCorrect(JobTest.java:78)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.apache.beam.sdk.testing.TestPipeline$1.evaluate(TestPipeline.java:319)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:35)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:32)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:93)
> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
> at
> org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.processTestClass(TestWorker.java:118)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:35)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:175)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:157)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHub$Handler.run(MessageHub.java:404)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ExecutorPolicy$CatchAndRecordFailures.onExecute(ExecutorPolicy.java:63)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ManagedExecutorImpl$1.run(ManagedExecutorImpl.java:46)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at
> org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ThreadFactoryImpl$ManagedThreadRunnable.run(ThreadFactoryImpl.java:55)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: class java.util.LinkedHashMap
> cannot be cast to class com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow
> (java.util.LinkedHashMap is in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap';
> com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow is in unnamed module of
> loader 'app')
> at com.ikea.search.ab.bootstrap.Session.<init>(Session.java:35)
> at
> com.ikea.search.ab.bootstrap.Job$CreateSessionMetrics.processElement(Job.java:82)
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Jeff Klukas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Does the stack trace tell you where specifically in the code the cast is
>> happening? I'm guessing there may be assumptions inside your
>> CreateSessionMetrics class if that's where you're manipulating the TableRow
>> objects.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:44 PM Kirill Zhdanovich <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting. All my code does is following:
>>>
>>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>>>     PCollection<TableRow> bqResult =
>>> p.apply(BigQueryIO.readTableRows().fromQuery(query).usingStandardSql());
>>>     PCollection<SomeClass> result = runJob(bqResult, boolean and string
>>> params);
>>>     // store results
>>> }
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> private static PCollection<SomeClass> runJob(PCollection<TableRow>
>>> bqResult,
>>>
>>>     ...) {
>>>         return bqResult
>>>                 // In this step I convert TableRow into my custom class
>>> object
>>>                 .apply("Create metrics based on sessions",
>>>                         ParDo.of(new CreateSessionMetrics(boolean and
>>> string params)))
>>>                // few more transformations
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> This is basically similar to examples you can find here
>>> https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/google-bigquery/
>>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 23:31, Jeff Klukas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:54 PM Kirill Zhdanovich <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So from what I understand, it works like this by design and it's not
>>>>> possible to test my code with the current coder implementation. Is that
>>>>> correct?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would argue that this test failure is indicating an area of potential
>>>> failure in your code that should be addressed. It may be that your current
>>>> production pipeline relies on fusion which is not guaranteed by the Beam
>>>> model, and so the pipeline could fail if the runner makes an internal
>>>> change that affect fusion (in practice this is unlikely).
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to update your code such that it does not need to make
>>>> assumptions about the concrete Map type returned by TableRow objects?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Kirill
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Kirill
>

Reply via email to