I can't think of a reason Schema should not implement Serializable. There's actually already an issue & patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1852 Doug On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 6:49 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > +d...@avro.apache.org > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:30 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I'm looking for any discussion or reference why the Schema object isn't > serializable -- I'm pretty sure this must have already been discussed (but > the keywords +avro +serializable +schema have MANY results in all the > searches I did: JIRA, stack overflow, mailing list, web) > > > > In particular, I was at a demo today where we were asked why Schemas > needed to be passed as strings to run in distributed tasks. I remember > running into this problem years ago with MapReduce, and again in Spark, and > again in Beam... > > > > Is there any downside to making a Schema implement > java.lang.Serializable? The only thing I can think of is that the schema > _should not_ be serialized with the data, and making it non-serializable > loosely enforces this (at the cost of continually writing different > flavours of "Avro holders" for when you really do want to serialize it). > > > > Willing to create a JIRA and work on the implementation, of course! > > > > All my best, Ryan >
