Hello Glenn, I don't expect the module name's front slash to be replaced with a file separator. I haven't checked the code yet. I'll take a look later today. What operating system are you on and which exact version of Ant are you using?
-Jaikiran On 14/05/19 6:07 AM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote: > I'm puzzled about which utility should be more flexible about the > module naming convention. With Java 11 from OpenJDK, I notice that > > java --module-path=jaxb-ri/mod -m > com.sun.tools.xjc/com.sun.tools.xjc.XJCFacade -d out -p generated > Schema_Specification.xsd > > works as desired, but > > java --module-path=jaxb-ri/mod -m > com.sun.tools.xjc\com.sun.tools.xjc.XJCFacade -d out -p > generated.armisxml Schema_Specification.xsd > > does not (only difference is the use of '\' and '/' in the module name). > > When one tries to use a Java task in 'ant', it translates the forward > slash to a backward slash, e.g., > > <java fork="true" modulepath="axb-ri/mod" > module="com.sun.tools.xjc/com.sun.tools.xjc.XJCFacade"> > <arg value="-d out"/> > <arg value="-p generated"/> > <arg value="Schema_Specification.xsd"/> > </java> > > Running 'ant' in verbose mode, it shows that the argument "-m > com.sun.tools.xjc\com.sun.tools.xjc.XJCFacade" is passed to the Java > program. > > So, which program should be more flexible? I haven't found a > specification of what the module name specification should be. But the > OpenJDK Java program requires that a forward slash be used. Should > 'ant' not translate the forward slash into a backslash? Or should the > OpenJDK Java program accept either one? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
